This updated report includes the reproduction steps to our Cloud Report findings in which we benchmakred AWS and GCP. These steps allow for copy-paste reproduction of our process to empower you to check our work.
Customers rely on us to help navigate the complexities of the increasingly competitive cloud wars. This inspired the 2018 Cloud Computing Report, where we benchmark performance, latency, CPU, network, I/O, and cost of AWS and GCP.
CockroachDB 2.1 is 50x more scalable than Amazon Aurora at less than 2% of the price per tpmC. Read on to see performance benchmarks of CockroachDB 2.1, including the latest TPC-C results.
We ran the TPC-C benchmark against CockroachDB and Amazon Aurora to compare price per transaction and discovered Aurora costs 10x more than CockroachDB.
JSONB makes it easy to tweak your data model and prototype new features, which makes it an ideal CockroachDB 2.0 feature for startups and enterprises alike.
CockroachDB achieves high OLTP performance of 128,000 tpmC on a 2 terabyte TPC-C dataset in size. This is 10x more TPC-C throughput than Aurora.
Geo-partitioning keeps user data close to the user, reducing latency and improving UX while archival-partitioning allows you to store data efficiently.
Learn which performance metrics matter, why to demand benchmark TPC-C results under serializable isolation, and how CockroachDB 2.0’s performance compares to 1.1.
With JSON support in CockroachDB, you can now use both structured and semi-structured data within the same database.
With geo-partitioning, you can control which nodes house data with row-level granularity, thereby reducing latency and improving user experience.